top of page

Can a Founder Move to Switzerland to Run a Swiss Company?

  • Writer: Paul Richmond
    Paul Richmond
  • 8 hours ago
  • 8 min read
Can a Founder Move to Switzerland to Run a Swiss Company?

A Swiss company can be incorporated without the foreign founder automatically acquiring a right to live or work in Switzerland. Company formation, residence permission and authorisation to perform gainful activity are separate legal questions. A Commercial Register entry, shareholding, investment, director title or signatory power may be relevant evidence, but none of them is a Swiss work permit.

 

For founders planning a Swiss GmbH/Sarl or AG/SA, the route depends on nationality and the activity actually performed. EU/EFTA and third-country routes are materially different, and the employee/self-employed classification can change the legal test and evidence required.

 

1. Forming a Swiss Company Does Not Give the Founder a Work Permit


Swiss company law governs formation and representation; immigration law governs whether the founder may reside and perform gainful activity in Switzerland. One does not substitute for the other.

 

A founder should therefore separate three questions from the outset:

 

  • Can the company be incorporated and validly represented under Swiss company law?

 

  • Does the founder have a lawful basis to reside in Switzerland for the intended period?

 

  • Is the founder authorised to perform the proposed work or other gainful activity in Switzerland?

 

The company may support an immigration application as evidence of a real Swiss business, funding, contracts or management need, but it does not remove the admission criteria. There is therefore no automatic Swiss entrepreneur permit created by incorporation.

 

2. Share Ownership Is Not the Same as Working in Switzerland


Article 11 LEI / AIG requires foreign nationals who intend to exercise gainful activity in Switzerland to have the required authorisation. The statutory concept covers salaried and self-employed activity and is deliberately broad: activity that is normally carried out for remuneration can remain relevant even when it is performed paid or unpaid.

 

For founders, the authorities will therefore look beyond labels. Holding shares is not the same thing as carrying out day-to-day management. By contrast, activities such as directing staff, negotiating and delivering client work, making operational decisions, managing sales or carrying out executive functions from Switzerland can amount to gainful activity and require an immigration analysis.

 

The practical question is what the founder will actually do, where and for how long. A person described as a passive shareholder may be assessed differently if the evidence shows that they are directing operations from Switzerland.

 

3. EU/EFTA Founders: Easier Access, But Formalities Still Matter


EU/EFTA nationals benefit from the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons (AFMP / FZA), so access to the Swiss labour market is substantially more favourable than for third-country nationals. That does not mean that a founder can ignore residence and work formalities.

 

For EU/EFTA self-employment, the founder must establish genuine activity and comply with the applicable registration process. SEM states that a self-employed EU/EFTA national must register with the competent authority within 14 days of arrival and submit documents showing the activity; it may not begin until the required documents have been submitted.

 

A founder who will instead work as an employee of the Swiss company should analyse the applicable EU/EFTA employment formalities rather than assuming that share ownership determines the route. In either case, residence duration and the concrete activity matter.

 

4. UK Founders and Other Non-EU/EFTA Nationals


For a British founder arriving for the first time to work in Switzerland from 1 January 2021, the third-country admission framework generally applies. Different rules can apply to British nationals who acquired protected rights under the AFMP before the end of the Brexit transition period, so the immigration history should be checked before treating every UK national in the same way.

 

For new non-EU/EFTA founders, admission is selective and normally requires the relevant approval before work begins. The file should identify whether the founder is being admitted as an employee of the Swiss company or is genuinely pursuing self-employment, and it should address the criteria applicable to that route.

 

5. Is the Founder an Employee or Self-Employed?

 

Swiss immigration law does not operate a UK-style sponsor-licence system under which a founder simply has their own company "sponsor" them. The authorities assess the proposed activity and the legal basis for admission.

 

Where a founder will be employed by the Swiss company - for example, under an executive employment arrangement - the third-country employment rules will usually provide the relevant framework. Where the founder is genuinely operating an independent business on their own account, Article 19 LEI / AIG on self-employed admission may be relevant. Corporate form, shareholding, title, contract and signatory authority are important facts, but the substance of the proposed activity must remain coherent across the application.

 

This classification should be resolved early. It affects which statutory criteria apply, who files the application, what evidence is needed and how the business plan should be framed.

 

6. Non-EU/EFTA Route 1: Founder Employed by the Swiss Company


If the founder is treated as an employee, the Swiss company normally makes the employer-led Swiss work permit application to the competent cantonal authority. The core framework is in Articles 18 to 23 LEI / AIG. Depending on the case and any applicable exception, the authorities may need to examine the overall Swiss economic interest, quota availability, labour-market priority, salary and employment conditions, and the founder's qualifications and suitability.

 

Ownership of the employer does not waive those tests. The application should explain why the role needs to be performed in Switzerland and why the founder meets the admission criteria. Evidence may include a conditional employment contract, role description, CV, qualifications, salary evidence, corporate and funding documents, and labour-market evidence where required.

 

Those documents are examples only. The competent authority may require different evidence depending on the canton, the role, any exemption relied on and the procedural stage.

 

7. Non-EU/EFTA Route 2: Founder as a Self-Employed Entrepreneur


For genuine self-employment, Article 19 LEI / AIG is the starting point. Admission must serve the overall Swiss economic interest, and the necessary financial and operational requirements must be met. Article 19 also cross-refers to other admission requirements, including quota and personal requirements. SEM describes the economic assessment in terms of a lasting positive impact on the Swiss labour market.

 

An immigration business plan should document the proposed Swiss activity and make the economic case credible. Relevant evidence may include financing, market analysis, financial projections, staffing or job-creation plans, investment, clients or contracts, Swiss partnerships and the founder's experience. No single item guarantees approval.

 

The existence of a GmbH/Sarl or AG/SA can support the evidence, but it is not a substitute for the Article 19 test. References to a "Swiss entrepreneur visa" are therefore best understood as shorthand for the relevant residence and work-authorisation route, not as a separate guaranteed visa category.

 

8. Director, Board Member or Sole Signatory Does Not Create Immigration Permission


Commercial Register status is relevant to corporate governance, but it does not decide whether the foreign founder may work in Switzerland. A board appointment, managing-director title or sole-signatory power must still be considered alongside the actual activity and the person's immigration status.

 

Swiss company law also contains its own representation requirements. A GmbH or AG must be capable of being represented by at least one person resident in Switzerland. That Swiss-resident representative requirement can be met by an appropriately authorised person; it does not itself give a foreign founder a residence or work entitlement.

 

Corporate governance, contracts, social-security treatment and the immigration application should be consistent. A supposedly passive founder is difficult to reconcile with evidence that the same person directs daily Swiss operations.

 

9. Plan Company Formation and Immigration in the Right Order


The safest sequence is to analyse immigration before treating incorporation as permission to operate personally in Switzerland. A founder should identify nationality and any existing Swiss status, classify the proposed role, choose the canton and business location, confirm the corporate representation structure, and then build the permit evidence around the real operating plan.

 

For third-country cases, the application strategy should be settled before operational work starts. For EU/EFTA self-employment, the required cantonal documents should be submitted before the activity begins. Premises, hiring or investment may support the case, but should be planned around the immigration timetable and any discretionary decision.

 

Early route selection also avoids inconsistency: the contract, business plan, Commercial Register entries and financial model should tell the same factual story about who will run the business, in what capacity and from when.

 

10. Contact Our Immigration Lawyers In Switzerland


Our specialist Swiss immigration lawyers can advise founders on the interaction between company formation and immigration permission, assess whether employment or self-employment is the appropriate route, identify evidence and timing risks, and help prepare a filing strategy for the competent canton.

 

To arrange an initial consultation meeting, contact Richmond Chambers Switzerland by telephone on +41 21 588 07 70 or complete our enquiry form.

 

11. Frequently Asked Questions: Swiss Work Permits for Founders


Does forming a Swiss company give me a Swiss work permit?

No. Incorporating a GmbH or AG, owning shares, investing capital or being entered in the Commercial Register does not itself authorise a foreign founder to live or work in Switzerland. The founder's residence and gainful-activity position must be analysed separately.

Share ownership and immigration permission are different questions. Whether any particular involvement requires Swiss authorisation depends on what the person actually does, where the activity is performed and whether it amounts to gainful activity in Switzerland.

EU/EFTA founders benefit from the AFMP / FZA and generally have much easier labour-market access than third-country nationals, but formalities still apply. A self-employed founder must prove genuine activity and comply with the required cantonal registration process before starting the activity.

A British national arriving for the first time to work in Switzerland from 1 January 2021 is generally assessed under the third-country LEI / AIG framework. British nationals with protected AFMP / FZA rights acquired before the end of the transition period may be in a different position.

Switzerland does not use a UK-style sponsor-licence model. If the founder is employed by the Swiss company, the company may make the relevant employer-led application, but ownership does not remove the applicable third-country admission criteria or create an entitlement to approval.

Article 19 LEI / AIG requires the proposed self-employed activity to serve the overall Swiss economic interest and to meet the applicable financial, operational and other admission requirements. A detailed business plan and evidence of financing, market activity, projected economic impact and the founder's ability to execute the plan may be relevant, depending on the case.

A pending application should not be treated as permission to start work. Third-country founders normally need the relevant authorisation before beginning Swiss operational activity, while EU/EFTA self-employed founders must comply with the applicable registration requirements and submit the required documents before starting.

No. A board or director appointment, or authority to sign for the company, is a corporate-law fact rather than an immigration entitlement. The founder still needs the residence and work authorisation required for the activity they will actually perform in Switzerland. 


This article summarises Swiss immigration law and guidance at the date of writing. Individual facts, evidence, cantonal handling and procedural positioning may affect the outcome. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR KNOWLEDGE CENTRE

Never miss a thing, subscribe to our Knowledge Centre to be notified when a new post is added

bottom of page